Prediction of Kay Stammers vs Marjorie Gladman Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
K. Stammers vs M. Gladman

Kay Stammers

GBR

3

Win

Played

0

Win

111

Age

117

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Marjorie Gladman

USA

3

Win

Played

0

Win

111

Age

117

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Stammers 3 - 0 Gladman

They have played 7 sets in total, with Kay Stammers winning 6 and Marjorie Gladman winning 1. The last match between Kay Stammers and Marjorie Gladman was at the US National Championships, 03-09-1936, Round: R4, Surface: Grass, with Kay Stammers getting the victory 6-2 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Stammers	3
Gladman	0

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(R4) US National Championships(09-03-36)

Stats

Kay Stammers

Marjorie Gladman

() Los Angeles Pac Southwest(09-13-35)

Stats

Kay Stammers

Marjorie Gladman

() Los Angeles Pac Southwest(09-14-34)

Stats

Kay Stammers

Marjorie Gladman

K. Stammers vs M. Gladman H2H Profile

K. Stammers	Stats	M. Gladman
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
78.25% (421-117)	Career Total W/L	72.18% (384-148)
1	Grass	0
2	Hard	0
3	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

K. Stammers vs M. Gladman Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kay Stammers has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Marjorie Gladman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kay Stammers, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Marjorie Gladman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Kay Stammers has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marjorie Gladman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Kay Stammers has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Marjorie Gladman winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Kay Stammers has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 81% (W/L 21/5), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 73% (W/L 24/9). Marjorie Gladman has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 81% (W/L 68/11), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 68% (W/L 192/91).
Player level: In the last year, Kay Stammers has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Marjorie Gladman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Kay Stammers winning 3 times and Marjorie Gladman being victorious 0 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Kay Stammers winning 6 and Marjorie Gladman winning 1.
The last match between Kay Stammers and Marjorie Gladman was at the US National Championships, 03-09-1936, Round: R4, Surface: Grass, with Kay Stammers getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kay Stammers has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Marjorie Gladman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kay Stammers has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marjorie Gladman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Kay Stammers has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marjorie Gladman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Kay Stammers vs Marjorie Gladman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

K. Stammers vs M. Gladman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

K. Stammers	Stats	M. Gladman
3	H2H Matches Won	0
6	Sets Won	1
37	Games Won	25
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (3/3)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/3)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

K. Stammers Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Southdean - 07-03-1949
Betty CouttsB. Coutts	W	6-1 6-4	Stats
SF Patricia Ward HalesP. Ward	W	6-0 6-2	Stats
F Jean Walker SmithJ. Walker	W	4-6 6-3 6-2	Stats
R4 Anne ShilcockA. Shilcock	W	6-1 6-0	Stats
Surbiton - 24-05-1948
R4 Viola WhiteV. White	W	6-1 7-5	Stats

View All

M. Gladman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Melbourne Hard - 05-06-1961
Ann JenkinsA. Jenkins	L	3-6 6-4 8-6	Stats
Melbourne - 24-11-1960
R3 Jan LehaneJ. Lehane	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Melbourne - 23-11-1959
R2 Judy TegartJ. Tegart	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
South Orange - 01-08-1955
R2 Janet HoppsJ. Hopps	L	W/O	Stats
Haverford - 18-07-1955
R3 Karol FagerosK. Fageros	W	6-3 4-6 7-5	Stats

View All

K. Stammers vs M. Gladman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

K. Stammers	Stats	M. Gladman
78.25% (421/117)	YTD Win/Loss	72.18% (384/148)
75.04% (866/288)	Sets Win/Loss	69.55% (797/349)
100.00% (6266/0)	Games Win/Loss	100.00% (6061/0)
80.77% (21/5)	Hard Win/Loss	75.00% (75/25)
80.00% (184/46)	Clay Win/Loss	68.63% (35/16)
82.93% (34/7)	Indoor Hard W/L	73.68% (14/5)
75.96% (158/50)	Grass Win/Loss	67.84% (192/91)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
73.75% (59/21)	Slam W/L	55.32% (26/21)
25.00% (3/9)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
79% (414/522)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	73% (374/515)
66% (71/107)	Deciding Set Win %	58% (66/114)
95% (393/374)	1st Set Won, Won Match	93% (369/344)
5% (393/18)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	7% (369/24)
31% (132/41)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (147/30)